Discuss a treatment intervention not discussed in Van der Kolk that could be promising based on the neuroscience of trauma. He discussed EMDR and Yoga and how they are applicable to neuroscience, but you are challenged to look into other trauma interventions and why, neurologically, they make sense.
250 words
- Incorporate a Biblical theme or worldview.
Criteria Ratings Points
Content 20 to >17 pts
Advanced
All key components of the Discussion prompt are answered in a new thread. The thread has a clear, logical flow. Major points are stated clearly. Major points are supported by at least two citations from the reading/lecture materials. Major points are supported by good examples or thoughtful analysis. A Christian worldview or biblical themes are included as well.
17 to >15 pts
Proficient
Most of the components of the Discussion prompt are answered in the thread. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably. Major points are supported by at least one citation from the reading/lecture materials. Major points are supported by good examples or thoughtful analysis. A Christian worldview or biblical themes are included as well.
15 to >0 pts
Developing
The Discussion prompt components are addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis. No citations are used from the reading/lecture materials. A Christian worldview or biblical themes are not included.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Content 20 to >17 pts
Advanced
Two replies must be present. Each reply focuses on a meaningful point made in another student’s or professor’s thread. Each reply provides substantive additional thoughts regarding the thread. Each reply to a student’s post provides one strength and one weakness found in another student’s original post. Each reply is clear and coherent and includes at least one citation from class or outside materials.
17 to >15 pts
Proficient
Two replies must be present. Each reply focuses on a meaningful point made in another student’s thread. Most replies provide substantive additional thoughts regarding the thread and an explanation of why the student likes or dislikes the idea presented in the thread. One strength or weakness of fellow student’s threads are included in the replies. Most replies are clear and coherent.
15 to >0 pts
Developing
At least one reply must be present. Some replies focus on a point made in another student’s thread. Replies could be more substantive regarding the thread. Replies lack clarity and coherence. Strengths and weaknesses of fellow student’s threads are not included in the replies.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Discussion Grading Rubric | COUC604_D10_202240
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure 10 to >8 pts
Advanced
Spelling and grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures. References are cited in current APA format. Initial post includes 250-300 words of content and each reply includes 125-150 words of content.
8 to >7 pts
Proficient
Spelling and grammar has some errors. Sentences are presented as well. Paragraphs contain some varied sentence structures. Where applicable, references are cited with some current APA formatting. Initial post includes 225-275 words of content and each reply includes 100-124 words of content.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
Spelling and grammar errors distract. Sentences are incomplete or unclear. Paragraphs are poorly formed. Where applicable, references are minimally or not cited in current APA format. Initial post includes less than 200 words of content and each reply includes less than 100-124 words of content.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Total Points: 50
Discussion Grading Rubric | COUC604_D10_202240
Recent Comments